Social media has established new and innovative ways for people to get in touch with each other. Both the Brexit referendum and US election have revealed the limits of modern democracy, and social media platforms are currently setting those limits. Media is being considered as the fourth pillar of democratic society after executive, legislature, and judiciary. This Social Media and Democracy section highlights the ongoing saga of how this new type of communications technology impacts the progress of free and fair elections across the globe.
We’ve always relied on many kinds of sources for our political news and information. ... reports the New York Times – if you think “fake news” is bad for democracy… Manipulation of our media environment by foreign as well as domestic actors is now the new normal. Media came into existence in 1780 with the introduction of a newspaper namely â€˜The Bengal Gazetteâ€™ and since then it has matured leaps and bounds. The role of the media is vital in generating a democratic culture that extends beyond the political system and becomes engrained in the public consciousness over time. The viability of media industry is naturally impossible where there is no democracy. Those who want to blame social media for the state of our democracy… Social Media and Democracy articles on Democracy Chronicles. Social media have been battered in recent years by growing concerns about disinformation, privacy breaches, and the spread of harmful speech. Social Media and Democracy articles on Democracy Chronicles. : Introduction Democracy means â€˜A system of government in which all the people of a country can vote to elect their representativesâ€™. Independent media nowadays have a big role in keeping societies awake to the extent that they can spot what is biased and what is rhetorical. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook now provide a structure for our political lives. Indian democracy. Democracy loses its essence in the absence of press freedom and press freedom cannot exist in absence of democracy. Such a regime, in his view, would keep the trappings of democracy, including seemingly free elections, while leaders would control the election process, the media … Ergo, media consumption is higher, and the ‘mobilisation’ perspective is less apparent. The book’s intriguing conclusion: social media are making democracies more “pluralistic”, but not in the conventional sense of the word, involving diverse but stable groups. When the media is under government control, published news and information are not credible, then, media does not play a role in democracy as a balancing factor to ensure the action of government. Social media may not create our bad habits, but it feeds them, and for one reason alone: money. To conclude, I really liked your comment about the necessity of independent media for the survival of any democracy. In this interview, Younge discusses media’s role within a democracy, how a polarized political climate can make media appear to be more radical than they actually are, and how the press can contribute to a better world. Be sure to also check out our Election Technology section … The last few years witnessed an enhanced interface between the media and common man. Beyond the control and limitation of the government‟s vital organ in large interest of the masses, media sometimes raise over or above. Democracy, press freedom and media viability are closely interrelated co-existential components contributing to the overall public good.